| 592 | 27 | 6 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
土壤中重金属的测定,前处理过程中消解效果是关键,分析过程电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)分析模式、内标及其浓度的选择很重要。实验分别利用三酸-微波消解和四酸-石墨消解对7种土壤标样进行消解,ICP-MS对其中的12种金属元素进行测定,通过测定结果对比石墨消解不同消解温度条件下的消解效果差异,比较不同浓度内标对土壤标样定量结果的影响;考察碰撞模式和干扰校正方程测定土壤中镉的结果差异;利用离子色谱评估两种消解方式消解后的酸根残留。结果显示,一定条件下两种消解方法对随机选取的大多数土壤标样,大多数元素均有较好的效果,7种土壤标样的12种元素,微波消解约87%的测定结果在参考值范围内,石墨消解约95%的测定结果在参考值范围内;离子色谱结果显示石墨消解的酸根残留更少。
Abstract:For the determination of heavy metals in the soil, the digestion effect of the pretreatment process is the key. The selection of the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry(ICP-MS) analysis mode, internal standard and its concentration during the analysis process is very important. The experiment uses three kinds of acid-microwave digestion and four kinds of acid-graphite digestion to digest 7 kinds of soil standard samples.ICP-MS measures 12 kinds of metal elements among them, and compares the different digestion temperature conditions of graphite digestion through the measurement results. The difference in the digestion effect under the following conditions, compared the effects of different concentrations of internal standards on the quantitative results of the soil standard; the difference in the results of the collision mode and the interference correction equation in the determination of cadmium in the soil was investigated; the acid radicals after the two digestion methods were evaluated by ion chromatography residue. The results show that under certain conditions, the two digestion methods have good effects on most of the randomly selected soil standard samples and most elements. For the 12 elements of 7 soil standard samples, about 87% of the determination results of microwave digestion are in the reference within the value range, about 95% of the determination results of graphite digestion are within the reference value range; the ion chromatography results show that there are fewer acid radicals remaining in the graphite digestion.
[1]石奥.中国无机分析化学[M].北京:中国标准出版社, 2001:93-111.
[2]程小会,邓敬颂. ICP-MS法测定土壤中12种金属元素时的样品前处理方法[J].化学分析计量, 2019, 28(4):115-118.
[3]徐聪,赵婷,池海涛,等.微波消解-ICP-MS法测定土壤及耕作物小麦中的8种重金属元素[J].中国测试, 2019, 45(5):85-92.
[4]孙秀敏,雷敏,李璐,等.微波消解-ICP-MS法同时测定土壤中的8种重(类)金属元素[J].分析试验室, 2014, 33(10):1177-1180.
[5]EVANYLO G, SUKKARIYAH B, ANDERSON EBORALL M, et al. Bioavailability of heavy metal in biosolides-amended soil[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2006, 37(15):2157-2170.
[6]吴为,武攀峰,缪明,等.滨江沿海地区耕地土壤金属污染特征及潜在生态风险[J].中国测试, 2019, 45(2):78-82, 110.
[7]倪张林,韩素芳,莫润宏,等.快速消解-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱测定林地土壤中9种金属元素[J].分析科学学报,2020, 36(2):304-308.
[8]冯旭,宋晓红,段伟亚,等.双向观测电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定土壤中的常微量元素[J].环境化学, 2015,34(1):200-201.
[9]龙加洪,谭菊,吴银菊,等.土壤重金属含量测定不同消解方法比较研究[J].中国环境监测, 2013, 29(1):123-126.
[10]丁冬梅,张赞,王记鲁,等.自动控温石墨消解仪溶样-原子荧光法测定土壤中重金属[J].分析试验室, 2016(9):1108-1110.
[11]肖立青,孙云超,邓述培,等.电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定《全国土壤污染状况详查》样品中的重金属[J].世界有色金属, 2018(9月上):190-191.
[12]闫学全.一种自动石墨消解-ICP-MS监测工业区土壤中的微量砷、汞、硒、锑元素残留方法的建立[J].中国测试,2018, 44(11):77-80.
[13]叶菁菁,穆小让,刘海燕,等.土壤中重金属元素含量的检测方法研究[J].环境保护工程, 2018(4):202-204, 209.
[14]BARRETT P, DAVIDOWSKI JR L J. Microwave oven-based wet digestion technique[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1987,50(7):1021-1023.
[15]XU Q, GUO W, JIN LL. Determination of cadmium in geological samples by aerosol dilution ICP-MS after inverse aqua regia extraction[R]. Electronic Supplementary Material(ESI)for Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2015,38(2):7-12.
[16]彭杨,吴婧,巢静波,等.土壤/沉积物中14种金属元素的ICP-MS准确测定方法[J].环境化学, 2017, 36(1):175-182.
[17]赵墨田,曹永明,陈刚,等.无机质朴概论[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2006.
[18]鲁照玲,胡红云,姚洪.土壤中重金属元素电感耦合等离子体质谱定量分析方法的研究[J].岩矿测试, 2012, 31(2):241-246.
基本信息:
DOI:10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2020080056
中图分类号:X833;O657.31
引用信息:
[1]吴佳伦,罗霜,李思思,等.微波消解/石墨消解-ICP-MS测定土壤中的多种重金属[J].中国测试,2021,47(05):58-63.DOI:10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2020080056.
2021-05-31
2021-05-31